FPA treads softly on potential breaches

FPA fpa members margin loans financial planning association chief executive

23 May 2008
| By Liam Egan |
image
image
expand image

Jo-Anne Bloch

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) is investigating whether any of its members received discounted margin loans from failed stockbrokers Lift Capital and Opes Prime, and if any of these breached its soft dollar code.

Chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said the investigation was launched “in the light of concerns raised by recent reports that planners were offered a discounted rate on margin loans for their own purposes from the two brokers”.

It would seek to establish whether FPA members accepted these discounts and if there were grounds to investigate these members for breaches of the code, Bloch said.

“We’re aware of a small number of our members that are involved with Lift Capital (although not of any involved in Opes Prime), and we’re currently reviewing who may or may not have received these discounts.

“I need to emphasise that we’re as yet unaware of any of these discounts having been received by FPA members, and as such, we have nobody to investigate at this stage.”

She also emphasised that even if a FPA member received these discounts, it would not automatically mean they were in breach of its soft dollar code, which requires benefits of $300 or more to be disclosed.

“Receiving soft dollar benefits is not illegal in terms of our code if it amounts to $300 or more and an FPA member has disclosed it on their publicly available register, and it has not biased their advice to a client.

“However, if these discounts are determined to be a soft dollar benefit by the review and any of these are found to have biased advice to clients, then that would represent a clear breach of the code.”

The public register, which principal members are required to make available for inspection by the FPA, would form part of the investigation, she said.

“The first issue for the review will be to determine if the discounts constitute soft dollar under the code and then whether any members received applicable discounts and have disclosed these.

“The next step is to determine whether any of these discounts biased a member’s advice, which essentially involves us determining if appropriate advice was given on a reasonable basis.

“This is the hard part — because if there are many products offering discounts, and financial planners used a range of products, it would be difficult to assume any bias.”

Any inappropriate behaviour by advisers will be referred to the Conduct Review Commission, an independent body within the FPA’s disciplinary process to “determine the nature of the offence and the sanction”, she said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Big Feller

This can't be a surprising development. I'm sure every Financial Planner in Australia has had an experience of being sc...

13 hours ago
One foot out the door

Just 15 per cent of advisers said they may exit the industry over the next few years, Thats about 2,300 advisers! if ...

18 hours ago
Craig Offenhauser

I think Mr. Toohey's conclusions and extrapolations are "currently" merging on the typical SMSF issue of "....prone to ...

3 days 12 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 2 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND