FPA points to hypocrisy on superannuation funds and fees

financial advice FPA superannuation fund members superannuation funds FOFA parliamentary joint committee government

9 February 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has reinforced its belief that superannuation funds should not be able to obscure the cost of scaled financial advice within administration fees.

In a submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee (PJC) reviewing the Government's Stronger Super legislation, the FPA has argued that all forms of personal financial advice should be subject to the same set of rules, "irrespective of the provider or subject matter."

The submission said the FPA believed a workable scalable advice framework was critical to enabling greater access to affordable financial advice for more Australians, with intra-fund advice being a subset of scalable advice.

"However, it is critical that the FOFA reforms such as the best interest duty and specific related remuneration provisions allow for scalable advice and are not undermined by the Stronger Superannuation reforms," it said.

"MySuper members should be permitted to access information (including general advice) about their superannuation interest as part of the administration fee, but not access personal financial advice which is paid for by all members."

The submission said that while the FPA completely supports the facilitation of factual information and general financial advice services to superannuation fund members, it does not agree with the provision and payment of 'personal' intra-fund advice services being bundled with an administration fee.

"The FPA has a number of concerns with this, not least the hypocrisy that underlines this position, especially in the context of the catalyst for the reform agenda underway as part of the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms," it said.

"Hidden fees, commission, lack of transparency and paying for services not received are all problems FOFA is trying to rectify in respect to the provision of financial advice.

Therefore, based on these objectives, how does hiding the fees associated with the provision of personal advice services such as intra-fund advice within the 'administration fee' serve to be in the interests of the superannuation fund members?" the submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Random

What happened to the 700,000 million of MLC if $1.2 Billion was migrated to Expand but Expand had only 512 Million in in...

1 day 19 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

The judge was quite undrstanding! THEN AASSIICC comes along and closes him down!All you 15600 people who work in the bu...

2 days 16 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

How could that underestimate happen?usually the quote transfer straight into the SOA, and what on earth has the commissi...

2 days 17 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 4 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 2 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 4 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND