Former AMP adviser banned for five years
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has banned a former AMP financial adviser, Desmond Winton Luplau, for five years, after finding that he failed to act in clients’ best interests and gave advice which was “well below community expectations”.
At the time of the offending behaviour, Luplau had been an authorised representative of Charter Financial Planning Limited, a company wholly owned by AMP Financial Planning.
He worked there from December 2013 to July 2016, which was the time period that the regulator’s surveillance had focused on.
Specifically, ASIC’s investigation uncovered that Luplau had failed to:
- Clearly explain what the advice was about;
- Consider the clients’ relevant personal and financial circumstances, including in some instances not obtaining those relevant details;
- Consider whether his clients’ existing financial products met their objectives;
- Compare clients’ existing products with those he recommended;
- Provide his clients with a clear and precise investment strategy; and
- Give appropriate disclosure about the benefits or consequences of replacing the clients’ financial products.
Additionally, the regulator found that Luplau’s record keeping practices were inadequate.
Luplau had also previously worked as an employee representative of Westpac from February 2005 to March 2010.
AUTHOR
Hannah Wootton
Recommended for you
ASIC has issued infringement notices to two AFSLs over financial advisers providing personal advice while they were unregistered.
Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes by as much as 51 per cent through comprehensive financial advice, according to a Vanguard study, but cost continues to be an issue.
AMP has announced a senior appointment to its North leadership team, reinforcing the firm’s commitment to the advice industry.
Despite the financial adviser exam being rooted in ethics, two professional year advisers believe the lack of support and transparency from the regulator around the exam is unethical.
