Financial advisers guilty of 'gaming' default superannuation fund system

FSC/stronger-super/ASIC/australian-prudential-regulation-authority/mysuper/financial-advisers/default-funds/financial-services-council/APRA/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/australian-taxation-office/government/

11 April 2012
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Some financial advisers have been as guilty as trade unions in seeking to "unfairly game" the system around default superannuation funds under modern awards, according to the Financial Services Council (FSC).

In a submission filed as part of the Productivity Commission review of the default funds under the modern awards regime, the FSC referenced research undertaken by Westfield/Wright which found that, "at present, the default superannuation system is shrouded in opacity and the influence of special interest groups/third parties through Fair Work Australia".

"Employers reported abuse by unions (and also financial advisers) to unfairly 'game' the default super system," the Westfield Wright findings claimed.

The research also confirmed the position of the FSC that the advent of MySuper funds as a result of the Stronger Super initiatives ought to put paid to the need for the current default funds under the modern awards regime.

The research found "the MySuper concept of standardisation, simplicity and fewer default options attracts overwhelming support".

Elsewhere in its submission the FSC urges that the new MySuper regime be used to enable employers to select any Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)-regulated MySuper fund as a default fund from 1 July, next year.

"If this were permitted, a designated Fair Work process would not be required, as an employer would be free to select any APRA-regulated MySuper product," the submission said.

"This approach has the benefit of removing conflicted industrial parties from selecting default superannuation funds which are approved without proper consideration by Fair Work Australia.

"To alleviate any burden on employers in selecting from many MySuper funds, the Government should maintain a MySuper website for employers and consumers," it said.

The submission said this approach would also remove another agency from the already complex superannuation system which involved APRA, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Australian Taxation Office and AUSTRAC.

"The more agencies involved, the higher the regulatory cost, the greater complexity and the likelihood of failings in consumer protection," it said. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

6 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

8 months ago

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call....

3 weeks 4 days ago

Despite the financial adviser exam being rooted in ethics, two professional year advisers believe the lack of support and transparency from the regulator around the exam ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has banned two advisers from the same advice firm for giving clients inappropriate superannuation advice that was not in their best interests. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
88.01 3 y p.a(%)
3