Fee model problems do not lie in admin

4 March 2010
| By Caroline Munro |
image
image
expand image

The administrative side of the move to fee-for-service is now the easy part of the puzzle as more administrative service providers evolve to meet demand.

One such service provider is REMex (Revenue Management Exchange), which has been launched by the founders of retail commission rebate service provider MyMoney Australia.

REMex sales and marketing manager Paris Kritikos said the online service was developed for the financial planning market to enable the client-directed fee model pushed for by the Financial Planning Association. REMex takes on the administration burden of collecting trail commissions from financial product manufacturers and converting them to revenue that clients can use to pay fees for advice.

Kritikos said REMex is different to other brokerage services or internal dealer group systems in that the payments become client-directed.

“Most brokerage systems internally will only ever pay the adviser — REMex will allow for all the tracking to be done at the client level, reporting on a monthly basis all the trails received. The adviser can set a fee within our system as well,” he said.

“It’s very transparent and the client is in control.”

He said the system also addresses the difficulty around dormant or legacy clients who are not being serviced.

“If the client and the adviser agree that they don’t need advice for the next 12 months, then all the commissions that have accumulated in the REMex account can be directly paid to the client’s bank account,” Kritikos said.

Practice management consultant Lap-Tin Tsun of E&W Strategic Partners said while independent services such as this are a good start, they are not ideal in an industry that seeks to free itself of commissions. And, furthermore, the costs for the service are still incurred by the client.

“The conflict is lessened, but in the technical sense commissions are still happening,” he said. “If at some point a client is legally entitled to not pay commissions at all because they are not getting serviced, just because you’re using a service to push the commissions back to them (and then taking a cut out of that for the privilege), when you think about it this is still a bit problematic.”

Ultimately, administration is the easy part of the puzzle, Tsun said.

“The real problem is, how do you actually position fee-for-service in terms of your clients and the services that you offer, and how do you then put that together in a compelling message you can sell?”

He said communicating the value of advice and then putting a price on it is the difficult part for planners.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

JOHN GILLIES

Might be a bit different to i the past where at most there was one man from the industry on the loaded enquiry boards a...

18 hours ago
Simon

Who get's the $10M? Where does the money go?? Might it end up in the CSLR to financially assist duped investors??? ...

5 days 12 hours ago
Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 5 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND