Federal Opposition lambasts Govt on short-selling
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC's) decision to extend its ban on covered short-selling has prompted strong criticism by the Federal Opposition.
The Shadow Minister for Financial Services, Superannuation and Corporate Law, Chris Pearce claimed the decision to extend the short-selling ban had been partly forced by the Government’s inability to regulate a disclosure regime.
As well, Pearce suggested that the Government’s legislative efforts on short-selling had proved ineffective.
“Although ASIC cited continued global turmoil as the catalyst for extending the ban until 31 May, a significant compounding factor has been the ineffectiveness of the empty Corporations Amendment (Short-Selling) Bill,” he said.
Pearce said the legislation had not contained sufficient detail on how the disclosure regime should operate, and this meant the regulator had been continually forced to issue orders.
“The bare-bones legislation, heavily reliant on non-existent regulation, still fails to specify how the disclosure regime would operate in terms of stock measure and regularity,” he said.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Licensee Centrepoint Alliance has completed the acquisition of Brighter Super’s annual review service advice book, via Financial Advice Matters.
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
