Doubts raised about validity of FASEA code and exam

FASEA/corporations-act/exam/

24 February 2020
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Future boards of the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) will have no choice but to come to grips with the legal uncertainty inherent in the FASEA code of ethics, according to academic, Dr David Millhouse.

Millhouse, an honorary adjunct senior research fellow at Bond University,  has provided commentary around the FASEA code and the notion of best interests and concluded that an Australian financial adviser can comply with the existing best interest provisions of the Corporations Act but be found wanting under the FASEA Code of Ethics.

What is more he argues that despite FASEA having published cameos describing various client circumstances, these are not cases, do not establish precedent and are not law.

He goes further by suggesting that the FASEA adviser exam may also be flawed with respect to its reference to the code.

Millhouse said that, despite this, financial advisers would find themselves carrying unlimited personal liability.

“Future boards of FASEA will have no choice but to come to grips with the legal uncertainty its Code of Ethics has created,” he said. “…The reading list for the compulsory examination contains no direct authoritative references to the central questions of best interest and, because of the way the Code is drafted, other law (for instance, what constitutes ‘informed consent’) which support the best interest duties. This raises doubts about the veracity of the examination for the adviser in their quest for legal certainty”.

Millhouse said the objectives of the Code of Ethics were doubtless pure but it did not have the jurisprudence and statutory support of pure liability civil law countries or the necessary supervisory architecture for effective implementation.

“These will take some years. In the meantime, the Code should operate on a comply-or-explain basis. Advisers, for their own defence, may themselves want to become status-based fiduciaries by virtue of contract and apply absolutist fiduciary principles,” he wrote.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

4 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months ago

Commonwealth Bank has formally dropped to zero advisers following LGT Crestone’s acquisition of its advice arm – some six years on from the Hayne royal commission. ...

3 weeks 4 days ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

1 week ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3