Don't just focus on planners, says FPA


|
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has sought to reinforce the issue of professional obligation in financial planning as a complementary consumer safeguard to legislative obligation.
Appearing before the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch made clear her organisation’s strong view on the need for professional obligation as well as a tighter definition of the term “financial planner”.
However, Bloch also urged the members of the Parliamentary Committee not to lose sight of the broad issues confronting the financial services industry by singling out certain groups of professionals.
“In order to reach rational outcomes that achieve the balance between robust consumer protections and a vibrant and competitive industry, we must ensure all areas of concern are covered and the inquiry does not single out certain groups of professionals,” she said.
On the key question of remuneration, Bloch’s statement to the inquiry reinforced the content of its submission arguing that remuneration practices needed to be addressed by removing product providers as determinants and influencers of remuneration.
Recommended for you
The month of April enjoyed four back-to-back weeks of growth in financial adviser numbers, with this past week seeing a net rise of five.
ASIC has permanently banned a former Perth adviser after he made “materially misleading” statements to induce investors.
The Financial Services and Credit Panel has made a written order to a relevant provider after it gave advice regarding non-concessional contributions.
With the election taking place on Saturday (3 May), Adviser Ratings examines how the two major parties could shape the advice industry in the future.