DBFO bill passes Senate
The Delivering Better Financial Outcomes bill has been passed in the Senate.
The first Delivering Better Financial Outcomes bill passed the Senate on 4 July and is expected to sail through the House of Representatives.
The bill has to return to the lower house due to the last-minute amendment that was made by the government this morning. However, it is understood that this is a formality and that the lower house will give it the green light before its five-week winter break.
Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, moved parliamentary amendments to omit language in paragraph 99FA(1)(a) which would require that the financial product advice, in respect of which costs are charged, is wholly or partly about the member’s interest in the fund; and repeal paragraph 99FA(1)(b), which would require that the amount charged does not exceed the cost of providing financial product advice about the member’s interest in the fund.
“These changes are intended to give trustees assurance that the bill does not alter the current regulatory approach and that they may continue to utilise robust risk-based assurance processes,” the supplementary explanatory memorandum reads.
Expounding on this, it further explains that those two requirements replicate existing requirements in the SIS Act.
“Trustees are subject to the sole purpose test in section 62 of the SIS Act, which requires trustees to ensure that the fund is maintained to provide benefits to the member. In addition, trustees have a duty to act in the best financial interests of the member under paragraph 52(2)(c) of the SIS Act.
“These broader obligations already apply to trustees exercising their discretion to charge relevant fees for personal advice to the member in accordance with section 99FA (the original section and as amended). It is expected that in complying with section 99FA, as amended by these parliamentary amendments, trustees would continue to ensure the relevant advice and costs relate to the member’s interest in the fund in order to satisfy their broader obligations.”
The document highlights that, “considering those broader obligations”, trustees still maintain the discretion on whether to pay the cost of financial product advice at the request or consent of a member.
“As such, removal of the references to the member’s interest in the fund does not, and is not intended to, impact the existing regulatory requirements and consumer safeguards applicable under the SIS Act in relation to financial advice,” the explanatory document adds.
It also clarifies that minor amendments have been made to language about providing advice, to more clearly address the range of situations in which financial product advice may be provided or procured.
Moreover, the document asserts that trustees are expected to continue to take a robust, risk-based approach to comply with their obligations under section 99FA as amended and the SIS Act more broadly.
AUTHOR
Keith Ford
Recommended for you
ASIC has permanently banned a former Perth adviser after he made “materially misleading” statements to induce investors.
The Financial Services and Credit Panel has made a written order to a relevant provider after it gave advice regarding non-concessional contributions.
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
