Court decision allows investors to pursue proceedings against MFL

property/federal-court/director/investments-commission/ASIC/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/executive-director/

3 October 2006
| By Tara Hayes |

A judgement by the Federal Court will make it easier for clients of the Melbourne-based company, Money for Living (MFL), to seek legal advice after an announcement last week that the company had been placed in the hands of administrators.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) application to the Court was sought in order to assist the purchasers of products offered by MFL and MFL Property Holdings (MFLPH) to pursue class actions or other proceedings against the company and its directors, Stephen O’Neill, Gary O’Neill and Jolanta Olszewski.

The court found that MFL was a financial product and the company had made false and misleading statements on their website and in the agreements that had been drawn up with vendors.

“The clarification of the legal position will assist elderly people who purchased MFL’s products in pursuing action against the companies and its directors,” Jan Redfern, executive director of enforcement at ASIC said.

MFL offered to buy homes but then allowed the former owners a ‘guaranteed lifetime tenancy’ in the property.

Consumers received the purchase price of the property in a lump sum payment, instalments or a combination of both.

In October last year, ASIC started investigating MFL alleging the company had made false and misleading representations in various agreements and materials, including in communications to 117 vendors who sold their homes.

MFL and MFLPH were placed into voluntary administration in September last year and criminal proceedings have also begun against directors Gary and Stephen O’Neill.

Stephen O’Neill is charged with four counts of obtaining financial advantage by deception, four counts of dishonest use of position as an officer of a corporation and two counts of managing a corporation while disqualified.

Gary O’Neill has been charged with four counts of obtaining financial advantage by deception and seven counts of dishonestly using his position as a director of a corporation.

ASIC alleges that Stephen and Gary O’Neill obtained mortgages from a financier totalling almost $1 million, by submitting loan applications that failed to disclose the life tenancies attached to the mortgaged properties.

Bail for the O’Neills has been extended and the matter is listed for a committal hearing in March, 2007.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 15 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo