Consistency urged on advice fees in super
One of Australia’s largest superannuation industry organisations, the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA), has told the second phase of the Cooper Review that financial advice provided in relation to superannuation should not entail commission-based remuneration.
The ASFA submission, which substantially backs calls by the Institute of Actuaries for the separation of fees into four different categories, said there was a need to separate out advice fees because different superannuation funds offered markedly different service levels for advice.
“It is important for members to be able to understand what they are paying for and utilise the services accordingly,” it said.
“For example, if they do not want advice they may prefer to choose a fund that does not offer the service,” the submission said.
ASFA said it believed the level of advice fee should always be shown, including whether it could be turned on or off.
The submission also called for a consistent industry approach with respect to fees, with standard definitions and standard disclosure arrangements.
“There needs to be a consistent and enforced methodology for calculating superannuation fund investment performance, both in terms of the fees and costs deducted,” the submission said.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
Licensee Centrepoint Alliance has completed the acquisition of Brighter Super’s annual review service advice book, via Financial Advice Matters.
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
