Changes to accounting ethics standards forcing industry change
As the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) proposes a new ethics standard for all advisers come 1 January 2019, the accounting sector reflects on pressures in the industry and changes to business following the introduction of the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants.
The changes to the Code now require accountants to report a client’s non-compliance under certain circumstances, forcing them to no longer “turn a blind eye”, according to managing director of Platinum Professional Training, Coco Hou. Accountants who fail to report non-compliance may face serious consequences.
“While accountants are trained to be highly ethical, there is no doubt that some accountants turn a blind eye to suspected compliance issues or they take their client’s word for it that all is fine because they are under significant pressure to bill and retain clients,” said Hou.
She said while confidentiality has always been a hallmark of the profession, she was confident the changes to the Code would raise ethical standards throughout the business and accounting sector.
“Hopefully, the latest changes to the code signal to businesses that accountants will no longer be able to maintain confidentiality where there are compliance issues that need to be reported,” she said.
Once changes to the ethics standards were made known to businesses, Hou said voluntary compliance would become more widespread.
“Businesses are going to make more of an effort to ensure they are doing the right thing and this means they will involve accountants more closely in their business to ensure new systems and governance arrangements are being implemented in a fully compliant manner.”
AUTHOR
Anastasia Santoreneos
Recommended for you
As the industry navigates the fallout from recent product failures, two major AFSLs have detailed their APL selection process and relationship with research houses, warning a selection error could “destroy” a licensee.
The impending retirement of financial advisers in their 50s could see the profession face significant succession challenges over the coming decade and younger advisers may not be the answer.
With a third of AFSLs being solo advisers, how can they navigate key person risk and ensure they are still attractive propositions for buyers when it comes to their succession planning?
A quarter of advisers who commenced on the FAR within the last two years have already switched licensees or practices, adding validity to practice owners’ professional year (PY) concerns.
