Change fund designations, says AMP
AMP has urged a move away from the model that pits industry superannuation funds against retail master trusts by implementing new descriptors for superannuation funds.
In its submission to the Cooper Review, AMP argued that the industry should move away from the categorisation of funds according to their ownership or legal structure such as industry, retail, corporate or self-managed fund.
It said instead, a new regulatory framework should be introduced based on the nature of the customers being served, such as 'default' market and 'choice market'.
In backing its argument, the AMP submission said industry funds had now generally become public offer funds and that the differences between large public offer industry funds and retail funds were becoming increasingly blurred.
It said notwithstanding the 'not for profit distinction', the customer offer from both segments had increasing similarities such as employing financial planners, the introduction of retirement products and the broadening of insurance offerings.
At the same time, the AMP submission argued that several retail funds were now offering low cost options that had many of the characteristics of an industry fund including low cost, simplicity and limited investment options.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
The ongoing adviser shortage is a key driver behind advisers’ increased use of ETFs and managed accounts, according to an industry expert, fuelled by the need for cost and efficiency savings.
A business consultant believes there is a proven correlation between advice businesses that develop and commit to a clear business plan and those that see higher profit outcomes, but only when done correctly.
Advice technology solution intelliflo has launched an integration with fintech firm FAYBL to introduce AI capabilities across the intelliflo office offering to boost efficiency.
ASIC’s court case with Interprac is causing advisers to explore the possibility of self-licensing, according to My Dealer Services, as they observe the reputational damage it can bring to a practice.
