ASIC snares rogue risk agent
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has obtained interim orders in the Federal Court against former insurance agent, Domenic Romeo prohibiting him from receiving any monies from clients for insurance premiums or arranging insurance for any persons until further direction from the Court.
Romeo, who used the business name Arkaba Insurance, is presently not an authorised representative of any licensee dealing in insurance products.
He was previously acting on behalf of Guardian Insurance Brokers and may also have referred to Total Insurance Services or Insurance Adviser Net Australia when discussing insurance with clients.
The court action was commenced following an investigation by ASIC into concerns that Romeo was receiving payments from clients for insurance premiums under the name Arkaba Insurances, despite not having authorisation to do so.
ASIC has warned former clients of Romeo or Arkaba Insurances to check whether insurance has been arranged on their behalf.
“If you use an insurance agent to make payments in relation to an insurance policy, ASIC advises you to check that the agent is properly authorised to act on behalf of an insurer or licensed insurance broker,” ASIC deputy executive director of enforcement Allen Turton says.
ASIC is also investigating allegations that in a number of cases, Romeo failed to place any insurance, even though a premium was paid by clients.
The matter is re-listed for directions on July 21, 2004.
Recommended for you
The corporate regulator has cancelled the AFSL of a Perth advice firm, with the firm having previously seen its licence temporarily suspended in 2020.
Having proposed changes earlier this year, ASIC has clarified how it will support licensees with additional relief under the reportable situations regime.
AMP has partnered with BlackRock and research house Lonsec to provide a model portfolio capability on its North platform that offers “portfolio customisation at scale” to advice practices of all sizes.
Money Management rounds up actions ASIC took against advice individuals in the first half for FY25 from exam falsifications to dishonest conduct.
