ASIC seeks orders against mortgage brokers

insurance/mortgage/financial-planning-advice/federal-court/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/director/

12 December 2006
| By Darin Tyson-Chan |

The corporate regulator is currently seeking orders in the Federal Court of Australia to stop Sample & Partners, a mortgage broking company, from engaging in misleading and deceptive conduct.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) alleges the organisation, its director Matthew Sample and its national operations manager Craig Turrell acted in a deceptive or misleading way when conducting initial consultations with their potential clients.

ASIC contends Sample & Partners breached the ASIC Act by enticing consumers to enter into contracts with the company by promoting that customers could pay off their home loan sooner without explaining additional payments would need to be paid to take advantage of this feature.

In addition, the regulator alleges Sample & Partners did not take the customer’s financial situation into account before either making a recommendation to switch to one of its products or recommending a lender from its panel, and held itself out to be an independent mortgage broking company when Matthew Sample had an interest in World Home Loans, which is on the organisation’s panel of lenders.

Further breaches of the ASIC Act have been alleged by the corporate watchdog through Sample & Partners’ actions in telling potential borrowers they could receive insurance and financial planning advice by dealing with the company when no staff were authorised to do so, and the entire market of lenders would be considered before a recommendation was made when only nine lenders were considered.

In response to these alleged breaches, ASIC is looking to obtain declarations from Sample & Partners, Sample and Turrell that they engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct.

ASIC is seeking Federal Court orders restraining the three parties from continuing to make such representations and orders whereby the parties have to implement procedures to allow clients of the company to make a claim for any loss or damages suffered as a result of the organisation’s misleading and deceptive conduct.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

2 weeks 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month 1 week ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 2 weeks ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo