ASIC reviews shorter PDS guidance
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has released updated guidelines on its shorter Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) push, reminding superannuation providers to detail cooling-off periods and costs.
Following the launch of the shorter PDS regime in June last year, ASIC conducted a review to see how successful it was and found that while compliance was high, some technical problems existed.
It said some of the shorter PDSs it viewed were hard to read because the font size was too small, or warnings were not formatted to attract attention.
In terms of content, the regulator stressed that cooling-off periods needed to be thoroughly explained and costs detailed, as well as benefits, so that the consumer was not misled.
Superannuation providers also needed to be aware that shorter PDSs might need to be updated to take into account Stronger Super regulatory changes, it said.
ASIC reminded providers that it had ‘stop order powers', which it would use if statements were seen to be misleading.
Recommended for you
Licensing regulation should prioritise consumer outcomes over institutional convenience, according to Assured Support, and the compliance firm has suggested an alternative framework to the “licensed and self-licensed” model.
The chair of the Platinum Capital listed investment company admits the vehicle “is at a crossroads” in its 31-year history, with both L1 Capital and Wilson Asset Management bidding to take over its investment management.
AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies.
With a large group of advisers expecting to exit before the 2026 education deadline, an industry expert shares how these practices can best prepare themselves for sale to compete in a “buyer’s market”.
