ASIC renews warning on financial services advertising
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has issued updated guidance on the advertising of credit products at the same time as warning promoters and the publishers of such advertising that it will be regularly reviewing the advertisements.
At the same time the regulator has pointed out that since it issued its original guidance in February, 54 advertisements across the financial services and credit sectors had been withdrawn or remedied following ASIC action.
The new ASIC guidance, an update to its Regulatory Guide 234, has emphasised the need for advertising to contain balanced messages about the returns, features, benefits and risks of a product or service, including warnings, disclaimers, qualifications and fine print.
Dealing with fees and costs, the guide states that where a fee or cost is referred to in an advertisement, it should give a realistic impression of the overall level of fees and costs a consumer is likely to pay, including any indirect fees or costs.
The guidance has also warned about the use of specific words and phrases, stating that terms and phrases should not be used in a particular way by the industry "where these are not consistent with the ordinary meaning commonly recognised by consumers (e.g. 'free', 'secure' and 'guaranteed')".
It said industry concepts or jargon should be avoided unless the promoter is confident that the audience will understand these terms.
Commenting on the upgraded guidance, ASIC Commissioner Peter Kell pointed to the number of advertisements which had been withdrawn or amended since the issue of the original guidance.
He said the ads had "raised concerns about poor practices and potentially misleading and deceptive conduct".
"ASIC has shown that we will take swift action when confronted with misleading and deceptive advertising," Kell said.
"When we see false claims, we will seek outcomes that involve potentially stronger penalties than we have sought in the past."
Recommended for you
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
Having peaked at more than 40 per cent growth since the first M&A bid, Insignia Financial shares have returned to earth six months later as the company awaits a final decision from CC Capital.
