ASIC claims ‘long-standing’ concerns on planning
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has sought to portray itself as having had long-standing concerns about the quality of advice being delivered by the financial planning industry well before the enforceable undertaking imposed on Commonwealth Financial Planning or the collapse of Storm Financial Limited.
In what will be the first of a number of submissions filed with a Parliamentary inquiry over coming months, the regulator said that by the time it had heard from whistleblowers within Commonwealth Financial Planning, it "had long-standing, publicly-expressed concerns with the quality of advice provided by the financial planning industry in Australia".
"ASIC's surveillance work, as well as our industry ‘shadow shops' (including in 2003 and 2006), demonstrated that poor quality advice was widespread in the industry," the submission said. "ASIC had publicly expressed these concerns prior to the major collapses that occurred in the financial advice sector, such as the collapse of Storm Financial, during the global financial crisis.
"At the heart of these problems were conflicts of interest embedded in financial advice distribution and remuneration that led to poor quality and inappropriate advice. Additionally, ASIC had flagged the need to raise professional standards in the industry," it said.
"Partly as a result of these concerns, ASIC undertook major financial advice surveillance projects on three of the largest industry participants: CFPL, AMP and Professional Investment Services. These surveillance projects ultimately led to enforceable undertakings with all three firms," the submission said.
The regulator acknowledged that it might have revealed sooner what actions it was taking around Commonwealth Financial Planning but used its submission to argue that, in any case, it had improved its procedures and practices since 2008.
In a statement accompanying the release of the submission, ASIC deputy chairman Peter Kell said the submission "acknowledges some processes in dealing with CFPL could have been quicker and more transparent, but we stand by the outcomes achieved".
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
Having peaked at more than 40 per cent growth since the first M&A bid, Insignia Financial shares have returned to earth six months later as the company awaits a final decision from CC Capital.
