ASIC allows legal relief but refuses ‘independence’ request
The Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) has reported that it has refused 32 applications for relief including one from a planner who requested the use of the word ‘independent' to describe their practice.
ASIC also refused an application to apply grandfathering to the remuneration earned by employees of licensee as a result of giving general advice.
The refusals were given by ASIC rejecting that ‘no-action letters' be applied in both cases, effectively forcing the two applicants to make changes as requested by ASIC.
The regulator stated it provides no-action letters "when instances of non-compliance with certain statutory provisions have been brought to ASIC's attention" and that it "does not intend to take regulatory action over a particular state of affairs or particular conduct".
In the case of the planner ASIC said the planner was not able to label their practice ‘independent' under conditions set out in the Corporations Act which restrict the payment of commissions, which the planner was still drawing on a declining book of old insurance policies.
The licensee was refused a no-action letter because ASIC stated while the licensee claimed the grandfathered commissions to employees providing general advice should continue until the proposed amendments to the Future of Financial Advice reforms had become law it was not a situation unique to the applicant.
ASIC said the issue was relevant across the industry and "law reform was the most appropriate form of resolution".
The refusals to provide relief were heavily outnumbered by the approvals with ASIC providing relief for 650 applications from a total of 803 applications during the period from 1 February to 31 May 2014 during which 57 applications were also withdrawn and the remaining 64 applications decided outside of this period.
ASIC released the statistics as part of Report 411 Overview of decisions on relief applications (February to May 2014) and stated that it can vary or set aside requirements of the law where the relief would provide "a net regulatory benefit" or reduce red tape without causing harm to market participants and consumers.
As such ASIC stated it was able, at is discretion, to modify or set aside certain provisions of the Corporations Act including chapter 5C relating managed investment schemes and chapter 7 relating to financial services.
AUTHOR
Jason Spits
Recommended for you
AMP CEO Alexis George has said addressing Australians’ retirement concerns should be "front and centre for policymakers” after its research revealed only half of Australians are confident about their retirement.
LGT Crestone has announced a rebrand, marking a “decisive milestone” following its acquisition of Commonwealth Bank’s high-net-worth financial advisory business in June.
The launch of a low-cost menu for BT Panorama will allow advisers to service a wider range of clients from one platform and potentially run a more profitable business, according to specialist Recep Peker.
Retail investment into private credit funds could surpass that of sophisticated investors, according to ASIC, but the regulator admits it is unsure how and where these individuals are first being introduced to the vehicles.
