APRA statistics should not be basis for advice recommendations
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has advised that fund performance data recently released by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) should not be the only basis for determining which superannuation fund to use.
The FPA has called for a more informed debate on the merits of selecting different superannuation funds following the release of APRA’s performance statistics, which are dated over a year ago.
Australians benefit from a choice as to which superannuation fund or structure they would like to use, according to FPA chief Jo-Anne Bloch.
“Choice and competition are critical and they are very much in play at the moment,” Bloch said.
“The role of the financial planner is to select the right product or superannuation structure to suit their client. If one particular product doesn’t stack up, don’t blame financial planners,” Bloch advised.
She pointed out that a lot has happened since APRA’s results dated June 30, 2008.
“Just ask some of the funds that were on the top of the tables last year but this year find themselves at the bottom of the tables, thanks to a particular investment style,” Bloch said.
Recommended for you
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
Having peaked at more than 40 per cent growth since the first M&A bid, Insignia Financial shares have returned to earth six months later as the company awaits a final decision from CC Capital.
