AFA concerned about ASIC funding model
The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has raised concerns about the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC’s) new funding model designed to help recoup costs of monitoring and remediating poor advisers.
According to the AFA, this model would pass costs on to all advisers, including those who acted professionally and ethically, making the process more expensive for ordinary people seeking advice.
Therefore, the AFA was calling for discounts for advisers who “do the right thing”, as well as a capping of increased costs and a minimum five-year review.
The AFA also said that any further increase in the cost of providing advice is likely to put quality financial advice out of reach for those who needed it most.
AFA’s chief executive, Philip Kewin, said: “There are currently no provisions to provide discounts for those advisers who are doing the right thing”.
“This seems unfair, particularly when all advisers have already had to bear a raft of costs, including increased professional indemnity insurance premiums and costs associated with upgrading Fee Disclosure Statements and incorporating opt-in arrangements.
“The AFA recognises and is an active participant in measures to ensure the highest professional standards are maintained to protect the consumer, but measures should be practical, affordable and reward excellence.”
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
Having peaked at more than 40 per cent growth since the first M&A bid, Insignia Financial shares have returned to earth six months later as the company awaits a final decision from CC Capital.
