Adviser wrong-doers should avoid returning to industry

ASIC/policy/financial-planning/ASIC-bans/

18 August 2017
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has confirmed that it has opted not to pursue some miscreant financial planners who have left the industry but that it will do so if they choose to return.

The regulator has used an answer to a question on notice stemming from a Parliamentary Joint Committee to acknowledge that it has previously opted not to take action against advisers deemed to be of “Serious Compliance Concern” (SCC) because they had left the industry.

“In relation to those SCC advisers who were not then in the financial advice industry we decided that no further action would be taken at that time,” the regulator said.

“We have placed an alert on ASIC systems to notify us if relevant advisers re-enter the advice industry and in the event they do we will re-consider whether the adviser should be subject to regulatory action.”

The ASIC answer said there was no obligation on an Australian financial services licensee (AFSL) to notify ASIC that it has identified adviser compliance breaches beyond the breach reporting obligations prescribed in section 912D of the Corporations Act 2001.

“If suspected adviser misconduct is notified to ASIC, whether as a breach report or a report of misconduct, we will consider whether a surveillance or investigation is appropriate to assess the need for regulatory or other enforcement action,” it said. “As part of that process, subject to the circumstances in each case, we may place an alert on ASIC systems to notify us if the adviser moves between licensees or seeks to re-enter the advice industry.”

ASIC said that it had directed financial institutions to notify it of advisers identified as having suspected serious compliance concerns.

 “Licensees also have an important role to play to ensure that advisers with poor compliance histories are identified when they move between licensees so that informed decisions are made in relation to the recruitment and supervision of those advisers,” the regulator said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 1 week ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 2 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

2 weeks 2 days ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision following this week's monetary policy meeting....

3 weeks 4 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

4 days 10 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo