Mergers and acquisitions: unexpectedly branded

financial-services-industry/australian-financial-services/insurance/axa-asia-pacific/wealth-management/financial-planners/ACCC/westpac/

23 November 2009
| By Mike Taylor |

In the space of just 18 months, the Australian financial services industry has been subjected to one of its most significant periods of consolidation, yet the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has remained impassive.

Westpac has taken St George, IOOF and Australian Wealth Management have merged and then taken Skandia, NAB/MLC has taken Aviva Australia and, now, AMP has emerged with a bid for AXA Asia Pacific.

While some might argue this activity has not significantly altered the competitive dynamic of the nation’s financial services industry, it has certainly reduced the diversity of the underlying options available to financial planners.

Moreover, it is arguable that the mergers and acquisitions have reduced the sourcing of the products they might ultimately recommend to clients.

What needs to be closely examined by the ACCC is not so much the overarching ownership of particular companies, but how this filters down into the operations of their various market segments, subsidiaries and sub-brands.

A combined AMP/AXA Asia Pacific will represent a substantial force in the Australian financial services industry, particularly where wealth management and insurance is concerned. Indeed, such a combined entity might arguably act as a counterbalance to the likes of Westpac/St George and NAB/MLC/Aviva.

But what these mergers and acquisitions have also served to do is change the commercial and philosophical ecosystems of individual financial planners. People who consciously sought to avoid working under a major bank brand have found themselves doing so. Clearly there are planners working within the AXA framework who will be uncomfortable working under the AMP umbrella.

Is this a bad thing? Will it simply give rise to more independents and more boutiques?

These are questions that can and should be examined by the ACCC.

After examining the situation it may determine that it is not justified in acting. However, it owes it to the broader industry and consumers to ensure that the right questions are actually asked.

— Mike Taylor

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 6 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo