Five years without fiddling with superannuation?
The Federal Treasurer, Chris Bowen, made a very good point when addressing the recent Financial Services Council annual conference in Brisbane – that in 1996 the then Federal Opposition promised to retain the Keating Government’s program to lift the superannuation guarantee but, ultimately, did not deliver.
Bowen gave the reference when suggesting that, in 2013, the Coalition had similarly committed to eventually lifting the superannuation guarantee to 12 per cent but would likely, as it did in 1996, reneg.
Or, the Treasurer must just have easily been referencing his own promise that a re-elected Labor Government would not significantly alter the superannuation tax settings for a period of five years, and that any policy change would be under the guidance of a committee of specialists.
One does not have to cast their mind back to 1996 to recall Labor’s failure on a superannuation promise. In 2007 the then Opposition leader, Kevin Rudd, promised that a newly-elected Government would not fiddle with the superannuation settings – “not one tittle”.
Thereafter, Labor imposed changes to the superannuation at every subsequent Budget.
Bowen’s promise of a five-year moratorium on major super tax fiddling must therefore be seen for what it is – a promise made in the run-up to a difficult election – which makes it only barely believable.
However, to be fair to Bowen, he did admit to the Financial Services Council annual conference last week that the sheer scale of Australia’s superannuation savings – and the beneficial tax treatment those savings are granted – would make them an ongoing temptation to Treasury officials and the Governments they serve.
What is more, the Treasury acknowledged that by committing to his five-year moratorium, he was not ruling out necessary changes at the margin.
The Coalition had earlier committed to avoiding implementing any unnecessary changes to superannuation and, in doing so, acknowledged that it would be guided by Budget reality as to what was sensible and what was not. To a degree, Bowen has given himself similar wriggle room.
In fact, the approach outlined by Bowen is simply an advancement of the Council of Super Guardians approach mooted by the former Minister for Financial Services, Bill Shorten, under which a group of Government-appointed specialists would guide policy direction.
The very nature and scale of the Australian superannuation industry dictates that it needs the sort of certainty that a five-year moratorium would deliver, but promises made in the heat of an election build-up must be seen for what they really are.
The proof of the pudding will always be in the eating – and no one in the super industry should relax just yet.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Recommended for you
In this episode of Relative Return, host Laura Dew speaks with Blackwattle Investment Partners managing director and chief investment officer, Michael Skinner, about setting up an asset manager and what he looks for in an investment team.
In this special episode of Relative Return, Momentum Media’s Phil Tarrant and Jordan Coleman discuss the publishing house’s expansion into greater coverage of the wealth management space.
In this episode of Relative Return, host Maja Garaca Djurdjevic speaks with Riley James, founder and chief executive of fintech SuperAPI, about creating a superannuation ecosystem and potential changes from the Quality of Advice Review.
In this new episode of The Manager Mix, host Laura Dew speaks to Anthony Kirkham, head of Asia-Pacific investment management at Western Asset to delve into everything fixed income in a world of rising interest rates.
