Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

ASIC comes out of the shadows

financial-planning-industry/compliance/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/industry-super-network/industry-superannuation-funds/chairman/financial-planners/

19 March 2009
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image image
expand image

So the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) intends to conduct another financial planning shadow shopping exercise some time after June 30, this year — meaning there will have been a two-year gap between such efforts on the part of the regulator.

No one in the financial planning industry should be surprised by the ASIC action. The regulator made clear last year that such an exercise would be scheduled, not least because it was something supported by the then newly-elected Rudd Labor Government.

Equally unsurprising should have been the fact that the first organisation to comment on the 2009-10 ASIC shadow shop was the Industry Super Network, with its executive manager, David Whitely, calling on the regulator to extend its efforts beyond simple compliance to whether advice is being provided in the ‘best interests’ of the client.

Of course, the environment in which the shadow shop is conducted will be very different to that which existed in 2005 and 2006. Investment returns have collapsed and as our front-page story reveals, financial planners are feeling extreme stress.

If the shadow shopping exercise is to have any meaning at all, it must traverse the entire financial planning industry, and that includes planners working for or on behalf of industry superannuation funds. Perhaps, too, the regulator’s shadow shoppers could try sampling the efforts of some of the call centre ‘advisers’ to whom super fund members are referred when they ask to transfer their balances into cash.

What ASIC ought to understand is that the financial planning industry has evolved since its last shadow shopping exercise and fund-related planners represent a significant part of that evolution. Connection to an industry fund does not carry with it impunity from appropriate regulatory oversight.

ASIC under the leadership of chairman Michael D’Aloisio is a less abrasive organisation than the body that was led by his predecessor, Jeff Lucy. It is to be hoped, on that basis, that the regulator adopts a more measured approach to any enforcement action evolving out of the shadow shopping exercise.

For this latest shadow shopping exercise to have legitimacy it must focus on compliance, not political agendas.

By Mike Taylor

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND