Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Super bodies mostly supportive of FSI recommendations

ASFA/association-of-superannuation-funds/AIST/government/superannuation-industry/superannuation-funds/superannuation-trustees/

8 December 2014
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The superannuation industry has applauded the Financial System Inquiry report's proposal to tackle income stream barriers and enshrine super goals, with industry bodies confident the recommendations will herald sustainability.

The removal of regulatory impediments to income steam products was heavily endorsed by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA), who said it will open up the innovation playing field.

"As the report recognises, there is no ‘one-size-fits-all' approach when it comes to providing income stream choices for retirees," ASFA CEO Pauline Vamos said.

ASFA has previously identified six types of income stream on a spectrum between default and comprehensive, but said the system greatly inhibited the variety of products on the market to meet those retirement needs.

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) was particularly pleased with the recommendation to enshrine super objectives in law to remove short-term political influences.

"This is a much-needed reform to protect the super savings pot — now worth $1.8 trillion — from endless Government tinkering and provide certainty for people trying to plan for their retirement," AIST CEO Tom Garcia said.

"We should not underestimate the profoundly stabilising effect this would provide."

Both bodies supported the recommendation to give MySuper time to be implemented and deliver its promised efficiencies, with Vamos adding it would "go some way to reducing costs and the delivery of the system".

However, Garcia was critical of the recommendation to instill a fixed independent quota on super boards, with AIST further dissatisfied with the inadequate definition of independence.

He said it ran counter to international best practice.

"There is no evidence to suggest that forcing structural change to the boards of not-for-profit funds would deliver better outcomes to members," Garcia said.

"These funds already significantly outperform with all but two of the top 50 funds over the last decade adopting the equal representation system of governance."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

7 hours 54 minutes ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

3 weeks 4 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

3 weeks 6 days ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

3 days 1 hour ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

1 week 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND