Ulterior motives driving super critics

23 February 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

People will continue to inappropriately use the Treasury's estimates on the cost of superannuation tax concessions to pursue their own agendas, according to SMSF Association chief executive, Andrea Slattery.

Slattery has told a Money Management roundtable that notwithstanding a clear statement by Treasury that the Tax Expenditure Statements (TES) was neither a policy statement nor a measure of money foregone, its contents would continue to be misused by the critics of superannuation.

"The $32 billion that has alwas been touted as the cost of [the] super [tax concessions]is misleading in terms of what has been interpreted in the market," she said.

"[It] should not be relied upon for revenue but that won't stop people continuing to use it as a buffer zone to see what they'd like to see in the Budget and to create a super pool of money available to cover their own agendas," Slattery said.

Former Count Financial chief executive and now executive director at Chase Corporate Advisory, Andrew Gale said he believed that if Treasury was obliged to produce the Tax Expenditure Statements then it was incumbent on the Treasury to ensure they were accompanied by a robust set of assumptions.

"The simple facts are that if the money wasn't in superannuation then it would be elsewhere, including in shares, and that is why the $32 billion is a considerable over-estimate," he said.

Premium Wealth Management chief executive, Paul Harding-Davis echoed Gale's concerns and added that he believed the TES was being consistently used out of context and that it was incumbent on Treasury to more fully address the issue, including in the media.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Simon

Who get's the $10M? Where does the money go?? Might it end up in the CSLR to financially assist duped investors??? ...

3 days 22 hours ago
Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 4 days ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 4 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND