Trust beneficiaries face new income tax amendment period
The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has confirmed that the income tax amendment period for 'potential' trust beneficiaries is four years.
Given the complex definition of the term 'beneficiary', BDO tax partner Mark Molesworth said there could potentially be thousands of individuals unaware that a longer period now applies to them.
He said the consequences of being a 'potential beneficiary' were highlighted in a recent Administrative Appeals Tribunal case - Yazbek and Commissioner of Taxation (2012) AATA 477 - in which the applicant was deemed a trust beneficiary despite never having derived any income from the trust.
"There is no need for an individual to actually receive a benefit in the relevant year - or indeed ever - from the trust to be classified as a 'potential beneficiary'," Molesworth said.
"The impacts of the extended amendment period could end up being beneficial, where the taxpayer discovers an error in their favour and wants to amend prior years to reflect this.
"However, the change could end up being quite serious for taxpayers under review from the ATO, because the number of prior years that remain open to amendment is larger," he said.
Taxpayers can avoid potential breaches of tax law by disclaiming their interest in the trust of which they are a potential beneficiary, Molesworth added.
He urged potential taxpayers to contact their tax adviser to determine the best course of action to take if they do make the decision to disclose their trust interests.
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Recommended for you
With just 30 per cent of Australians knowing their superannuation balance to the nearest $1,000, Findex has emphasised the role of financial advice in addressing the critical super knowledge gap.
Underestimating the cost of insurance by almost $75,000 in a Statement of Advice is among multiple reasons that a relevant provider has faced action from the FSCP.
Financial Services Council chief executive, Blake Briggs, is urging Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, to take advantage of the QAR opportunity to reduce regulatory duplication and ensure advice is affordable.
Former chair of the House of Representatives’ Standing Economics Committee, Tim Wilson, is planning a return to politics after losing his seat in the 2022 federal election.
