Superannuation guarantee increase flawed by tax link

government/superannuation-guarantee/taxation/superannuation-funds/federal-government/trustee/chief-executive/money-management/

3 November 2011
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image image
expand image

The Federal Government should not have linked increasing the superannuation guarantee to 12 per cent to the imposition of the Mineral Resources Rent Tax.

That is the bottom line of a roundtable held yesterday by Money Management's sister publication Super Review, with key participants saying that "superannuation should be treated as superannuation and nothing else".

NGS Super trustee John Quessy said that linking the superannuation guarantee increase to a tax carried with it the risk that another Government would remove that tax and therefore the increase to the SG.

"To make retirement savings dependent on some tax that is popular with the Government at the moment but might not be popular with some other Government in the future means it could subsequently be reversed," he said.

"That could kill the tax and therefore the superannuation," Quessy said. "And if you're serious about superannuation, you treat it as superannuation."

Pillar Administration chief executive Peter Beck said he agreed with Quessy's assessment but said he also understood the Government's need to find a way of funding the rise in the superannuation.

"The Government's problem has been finding ways of funding this, but as an industry we should not express an opinion on where they get the funding from. We should push very hard for the SG contribution being increased and they should find the funding," he said.

Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia general manager of policy David Graus said his organisation agreed there should be no link between a tax and the superannuation guarantee.

"We totally agree it shouldn't be linked, there is enough justification (to increase the SG) on its own," he said.

"ASFA's research shows that it should go ahead on a standalone basis," Graus said.

Deloitte partner Russell Mason said the industry needed to be mindful that 12 per cent would not be enough to fund retirement and relieve pressure on the superannuation guarantee, and that further increases would be required in the future.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 5 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

5 days 13 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks 1 day ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo