Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Super investments disclosure benefits not yet proven

superannuation-funds/federal-government/corporations-act/disclosure/super-funds/

14 August 2014
| By Jason |
image
image image
expand image

The Federal Government has not provided sufficient regulatory or consumer benefits to justify superannuation funds reporting their portfolio holdings and has not made provision for super funds being unable to fully report holdings in private investments according to a leading legal firm.

In a report titled "Reporting Red Tape" which examines the upcoming legal requirements for superannuation funds to disclose portfolio holdings legal firm King & Wood Mallesons stated the provision of disclosed information will make little difference to fund members who are typically lack control over super fund investment decisions and are unable to act on the information.

The report noted that while the explanatory memorandum to the relevant amendment to the Corporations Act to create the disclosure regime stated "portfolio disclosure in Australia is unduly opaque" it did not identify any "specific outcome of the changes nor any real benefit to members".

"This raises a question as to why the Government should impose new and additional regulatory burdens, the costs of which will ultimately be borne by the members who have not demanded the data," the report stated.

"Why impose a burden where the benefits have not been enumerated? Plus, as with all regulatory requirements that result in a practical and administrative burden, investment reporting by superannuation funds comes at a cost. A cost that will ultimately be borne by the members of the superannuation funds."

The report also stated the disclosure requirements, due to start in July 2015, do not take into consideration offshore and private investments where information may not be available due to the underlying nature of the investment or because of confidentiality agreements.

It argued that forcing these investments to provide information may shrink the investment universe available to super funds and funds should only be forced to be disclose information on private investment where it would not act against the best interests of fund members.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND