Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Super fund insurance policies seriously flawed

superannuation/super-policy/insurance/

23 May 2016
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image image
expand image

The insurance policy of superannuation funds are seriously letting down people, according to Blueleaf Consulting.

A recent column by Blueleaf's principal, Gary O'Sullivan, looked at the quality of industry super funds' insurance offerings and found the ‘income off-set provision' was a significant flaw.

O'Sullivan said the ‘off-set' clause was defective as it off-sets any benefits received under the insurance policy in particular if a fund member has two or more policies in place.

"Industry super funds provide a range of insurance benefits to their members including, income protection and death, and total and permanent disablement cover. Unfortunately, as we all know, as far as the quality of insurance contracts are concerned, the ‘devil is in the detail'. There is at least one significant flaw in the majority of the industry super funds' insurance offerings," he said.

"The flaw I am referring to is the ‘income off-set provision' under their respective group income protection policies"

Taking into account that a profound number of Australians end up with multiple super funds, it becomes a real issue for many. However, he said the industry broadly accepted that an individual should be entitled to cover up to 75 to 80 per cent of their pre-disability income under an income protection policy. At the same time this level should also provide an incentive to return to work.

He explained that in some cases where the a fund members held more than one policy, they ended up with being paid significantly less than the agreed 80 per cent of their pre-disability income level because the ‘set-off' clause had been applied which effectively had reduced the benefits being received leading to the outcomes that some fund members received less than 60 per cent of their pre-disability income level.

"Industry super funds should address this issue with the group insurers," he added.

O'Sullivan proposed that instead of applying an off-set clause, the income protection benefits should be reduced only where the total monthly benefits payable exceeded 80 per cent of pre-disability income levels.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

3 days 17 hours ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

4 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

6 days 11 hours ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 1 day ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

1 week 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND