Super bills ‘leave pass’ for banks

commonwealth-bank/policy/superannuation/SuperRatings/

15 September 2017
| By Malavika |
image
image image
expand image

Superannuation bills reintroduced by the Federal Government into Parliament yesterday pose a risk to the not-for-profit superannuation sector and give the banks a “leave pass” on new transparency and disclosure requirements, according to Industry Super Australia (ISA).

Responding to the government’s reintroduction of the bill, ISA argued the government’s agenda was not about improving governance and transparency but furthering the commercial interests of the banks.

“The Strengthening Trustee Arrangements Bill will dismantle the successful industry super and not-for-profit super governance model,” ISA said.

“The Improving Accountability and Member Outcomes in Superannuation Bill 2017 will enhance trustee obligations and regulatory powers in the default super sector but not 83 per cent of retail sector assets dominated by big bank-owned funds.” 

The government’s package includes making super funds more transparent on how they spend members’ money through new reporting of expenses, giving workers choice of their own super fund if they were currently prevented from doing so due to enterprise bargaining agreements or workplace determinations, and legislating a consistent minimum standard for one-third independent directors, including an independent chair.

ISA also argued the government had not presented any evidence their proposals would improve members’ returns.

“The evidence is clear: for the 10 years to 30 June 2017, SuperRatings monthly data shows, on average industry super funds have outperformed bank-owned super funds by more than two per cent a year,” it said.

It also cited examples where banks have had to provide customers compensation including ANZ paying an extra $10.5 million to 160,000 customers after the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) found it had incorrectly processed members’ super contributions and failed to deal with lost inactive member balances correctly.

It also cited the Commonwealth Bank (CBA) having to repay an estimated $105.6 million for charging fees where no advice was provided.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 4 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo