Related party rules could see unintended breaches: SPAA

smsf-trustees/self-managed-superannuation-funds/government-and-regulation/APRA/compliance/smsf-professionals/SPAA/SMSFs/

20 March 2013
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Changes to the legislation around related party transactions for self-managed superannuation funds (SMSF) could see trustees punished for unintentional breaches, according to SMSF Professionals' Association (SPAA) technical director Peter Burgess.

Burgess expressed concerns about the changes to the language in the draft legislation aimed at tightening the rules relating to the acquisition and disposal of listed and unlisted securities by SMSFs and related parties.

Particularly, he pointed to the decision to change the legislative requirement from ‘must not intentionally acquire an asset from a related party of the fund' to ‘must not acquire an asset from a related party' as having "serious consequences for SMSF trustees".

"Removing the word ‘intentionally' may have important implications for SMSF trustees who may be considered to have breached the related party asset rules even though it was unintentional, especially as new administrative and civil penalties will apply under this legislation," said Burgess.

The definition of ‘related party' could give rise to situations where the entity concerned is a subsidiary company "further down the chain of ownership", said Burgess.

The requirement that trustees ‘must not intentionally acquire' must be retained in the new SMSF related party acquisition rules, he said.

"It would mean inadvertent purchases of assets from related parties would not be penalised, as well as maintain an equitable position with APRA-regulated funds," said Burgess.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 3 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 4 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

3 weeks 6 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

2 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

1 week 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo