RC questions funding of ‘fox in henhouse’ campaign
Royal Commissioner Kenneth Hayne has questioned whether the industry superannuation funds ‘fox in the henhouse” advertisements complied with the sole purpose test or was likely to benefit the members of industry superannuation funds.
Commissioner Hayne raised the questions after hearing testimony from AustralianSuper chief executive, Ian Silk as part of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services industry.
In doing so, Commissioner Hayne said he should not be interpreted as expressing a position on the status of industry funds expenditure on the advertising.
However, he said that it appeared that a payment had made for a form of political communication so as to influence parliamentarians who made public policy.
Commissioner Hayne said the advertisement could be perceived as being directed to persuading those politicians and that superannuation fund members had undertaken payment for political communication.
He said the question became whether this could or could not be in the best interests of members.
Recommended for you
With just 30 per cent of Australians knowing their superannuation balance to the nearest $1,000, Findex has emphasised the role of financial advice in addressing the critical super knowledge gap.
Underestimating the cost of insurance by almost $75,000 in a Statement of Advice is among multiple reasons that a relevant provider has faced action from the FSCP.
Financial Services Council chief executive, Blake Briggs, is urging Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, to take advantage of the QAR opportunity to reduce regulatory duplication and ensure advice is affordable.
Former chair of the House of Representatives’ Standing Economics Committee, Tim Wilson, is planning a return to politics after losing his seat in the 2022 federal election.
