No room for ideology in super policy: ISA

superannuation/ISA/independent-directors/Governance/

29 October 2015
| By Nicholas |
image
image image
expand image

Legislation demanding not-for-profit superannuation funds adopt one-third independent directors onto their boards could put the savings of millions of Australians at risk.

Addressing the Senate Economics Legislation Committee Inquiry into the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Governance) Bill 2015, Industry Super Australia chief executive, David Whiteley, said "there is no room for ideology in superannuation policy".

Whilteley told the committee that the proposed changes amounted to an "over-reach" by the Government.

"These changes risk transforming the structure, character and ultimately the performance of the not-for-profit sector, whether deliberately or otherwise," he said.

"What the Bill would achieve, if passed, is to dismantle the structure and character of the industry funds which stand between consumers' retirement savings and the four major banks.

"The quality of retirement for millions of Australians is dependent, in part at least, on the performance of their super fund. This bill is a risk to the savings of millions of Australian workers."

Whiteley said the Bill "is at odds with the Government's stated objectives".

"One of the Government's objectives is to better align fund governance with the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) approach," he said.

"However, the prescriptive approach of the Bill and unprecedented powers proposed for APRA (Australian Prudential Regulation Authority) are inconsistent with the principles-based approach of the ASX."

The ISA chief executive also noted that the Productivity Commission's 2012 review considered evidence to "compelling evidence" to support the introduction of quotas of independent directors on super fund boards, instead supporting the governance reforms contained in the Stronger Super Reforms.

"The Productivity Commission has a fierce reputation for its rigor and ignoring its important contribution would not be a sound way to proceed," Whiteley said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

6 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

8 months ago

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call....

3 weeks 4 days ago

Despite the financial adviser exam being rooted in ethics, two professional year advisers believe the lack of support and transparency from the regulator around the exam ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has banned two advisers from the same advice firm for giving clients inappropriate superannuation advice that was not in their best interests. ...

3 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
88.01 3 y p.a(%)
3