No room for ideology in super policy: ISA

superannuation/ISA/independent-directors/Governance/

29 October 2015
| By Nicholas |
image
image image
expand image

Legislation demanding not-for-profit superannuation funds adopt one-third independent directors onto their boards could put the savings of millions of Australians at risk.

Addressing the Senate Economics Legislation Committee Inquiry into the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Governance) Bill 2015, Industry Super Australia chief executive, David Whiteley, said "there is no room for ideology in superannuation policy".

Whilteley told the committee that the proposed changes amounted to an "over-reach" by the Government.

"These changes risk transforming the structure, character and ultimately the performance of the not-for-profit sector, whether deliberately or otherwise," he said.

"What the Bill would achieve, if passed, is to dismantle the structure and character of the industry funds which stand between consumers' retirement savings and the four major banks.

"The quality of retirement for millions of Australians is dependent, in part at least, on the performance of their super fund. This bill is a risk to the savings of millions of Australian workers."

Whiteley said the Bill "is at odds with the Government's stated objectives".

"One of the Government's objectives is to better align fund governance with the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) approach," he said.

"However, the prescriptive approach of the Bill and unprecedented powers proposed for APRA (Australian Prudential Regulation Authority) are inconsistent with the principles-based approach of the ASX."

The ISA chief executive also noted that the Productivity Commission's 2012 review considered evidence to "compelling evidence" to support the introduction of quotas of independent directors on super fund boards, instead supporting the governance reforms contained in the Stronger Super Reforms.

"The Productivity Commission has a fierce reputation for its rigor and ignoring its important contribution would not be a sound way to proceed," Whiteley said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 3 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 4 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

3 weeks 6 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

2 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

1 week 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo