ISA defends board structure

industry-super-funds/superannuation-funds/industry-super-australia/trustee/assistant-treasurer/chief-executive-officer/government/

2 December 2013
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Industry super funds' board structure has helped them achieve "superior returns" for their members, according to Industry Super Australia (ISA) chief executive officer David Whiteley.

Whiteley's comment came after the release of the Government's discussion paper on governance, transparency and competition in superannuation, which proposed all superannuation funds appoint majority independent directors to their boards.

This particular proposal is seen as specifically targetting industry super funds.

"By being free from relationships that could materially interfere with their judgment they [superannuation funds] can provide an objective assessment of issues," the discussion paper, released by the Assistant Treasurer, Senator Arthur Sinodinos, read.

However, Whiteley said funds with the representative trustee structure were run only to benefit members and have outperformed retail super funds — typically run by banks — over the past 12 years by an average of 2.3 per cent per year.

"The representative trustee system is a feature of retirement systems globally and in Australia has delivered fund members superior net returns over the long term, when compared to retail super funds typically run by banks," he said.

"Representative trustee board composition is not homogenous, with many funds having independent directors and/or chairs."

According to ISA, member returns should be central to proposed changes to the regulation of the superannuation sector.

The industry super fund body is also unhappy with the proposed changes to the way workplace default funds are selected.

ISA had expressed concern that few employers will have the time or expertise to select a default fund for their employees from the expected 100 MySuper options.

"Default superannuation funds have a critical role in ensuring the super system delivers to members who are not engaged with their super. It is absolutely critical that only the best performing funds make the cut. Industry SuperFunds are concerned that these proposals will remove an important merit based process which is transparent, independent and places a premium on member returns," Whiteley said

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

4 days 2 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo