IPA questions competitiveness of super system post-PC

The Institute of Public Accountants (IPA) has called for more consideration of whether the inefficiencies of the superannuation system are due to a lack of marketplace competition or structural problems in the wake of the Productivity Commission’s report.

While the group supported the Commission’s recommendation for performance benchmarks around returns, fees, level of service and projected retirement income, IPA chief executive, Andrew Conway, noted that greater price transparency had not led to more competition or greatly reduced fees.

 “Reforms on the demand side especially around the introduction of standardised products and enhanced transparency of information should result in improved efficiency and innovation in product development,” Conway also said.

Related News:

“However, competition and efficiency may not always be synonymous as competition which means spending on marketing to gain new members with a focus on profit-making may not improve efficiency.”

The group also argued for attention to be paid to improving financial literacy, as this would improve member engagement which should in turn enhance competition.

Related Content

Director elections, CEO pay disclosure key to improving accountability

Annual director elections, non-binding shareholder resolutions, binding votes on remuneration policies, and chief executive pay ratios disclosure woul...Read more

How does MySuper stack up against other options?

With new research showing that a significant majority of super fund members don’t swap out of MySuper options, Money Management looked at data from ...Read more

Super funds dragging their feet on after-tax reforms

Superannuation funds have largely ignored the after-tax investing obligations that the Stronger Super reforms embedded into the law, implementation ma...Read more



Add new comment