Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Industry funds: change advice definition in TASA

future-of-financial-advice/government-and-regulation/financial-planning/FPA/industry-funds/industry-super-network/AIST/industry-super-funds/financial-advice-reforms/financial-planning-association/parliamentary-joint-committee/corporations-act/

18 June 2013
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Two peak bodies are calling for a clearer definition of the word 'advice’, as the current wording of the Tax Agent Services Act (TASA) prohibits industry super funds from providing intra-fund advice. 

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) and the Industry Super Network (ISN) lodged a joint submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee (PJC) last Friday requesting the word 'advice’ be replaced with 'personal financial product advice’, which would exclude intra-fund advice from the requirements contained in TASA. 

AIST and ISN raised similar concerns to those of the Financial Planning Association, particularly with respect to the fact that the Act covers any professional who provides financial advice service where tax advice is provided. 

However, the two industry fund bodies are worried that 'advice’ is not limited to financial product advice and may include general strategies. 

“It is in this context that AIST and ISN do not believe that the limitation to services that are charged for as proposed in subsection 50-5(2A)(c) is restrictive enough,” the submission read. 

“Professionals who provide [intra-fund advice] services are a broad group and can include call centre operators, business development officers, member education personnel and others who would not ordinarily be considered to fall under the category of financial planners, as originally conceived.” 

The two bodies stated almost every discussion held with members would involve tax in one way or another and would thus constitute tax advice under the Act. 

It is for this reason that AIST and ISN believe that the wording should be changed. 

“Furthermore, AIST and ISN recommend that 'personal financial product advice’ have the same meaning as that contained at section 766B of the Corporations Act,” the submission read. 

The submission has also called for clear disclosure as to who would be responsible for the tax advice provided. It also raised questions about how the TASA regime would work in relation to the advisers’ best interest duty required under the Future of Financial Advice reforms package.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

6 days 23 hours ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 2 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 2 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND