Industry funds: change advice definition in TASA

18 June 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Two peak bodies are calling for a clearer definition of the word 'advice’, as the current wording of the Tax Agent Services Act (TASA) prohibits industry super funds from providing intra-fund advice. 

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) and the Industry Super Network (ISN) lodged a joint submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee (PJC) last Friday requesting the word 'advice’ be replaced with 'personal financial product advice’, which would exclude intra-fund advice from the requirements contained in TASA. 

AIST and ISN raised similar concerns to those of the Financial Planning Association, particularly with respect to the fact that the Act covers any professional who provides financial advice service where tax advice is provided. 

However, the two industry fund bodies are worried that 'advice’ is not limited to financial product advice and may include general strategies. 

“It is in this context that AIST and ISN do not believe that the limitation to services that are charged for as proposed in subsection 50-5(2A)(c) is restrictive enough,” the submission read. 

“Professionals who provide [intra-fund advice] services are a broad group and can include call centre operators, business development officers, member education personnel and others who would not ordinarily be considered to fall under the category of financial planners, as originally conceived.” 

The two bodies stated almost every discussion held with members would involve tax in one way or another and would thus constitute tax advice under the Act. 

It is for this reason that AIST and ISN believe that the wording should be changed. 

“Furthermore, AIST and ISN recommend that 'personal financial product advice’ have the same meaning as that contained at section 766B of the Corporations Act,” the submission read. 

The submission has also called for clear disclosure as to who would be responsible for the tax advice provided. It also raised questions about how the TASA regime would work in relation to the advisers’ best interest duty required under the Future of Financial Advice reforms package.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND