Independent directors ‘unwarranted’: Chalmers

20 October 2015
| By Nicholas |
image
image
expand image

Speaking against the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Governance) Bill 2015, which will demand super fund boards be made up of one third independent directors, new shadow minister for financial services and superannuation, Dr Jim  Chalmers, rejected the Government's claim that independent directors would improve performance.

"The bill represents nothing more than a change to our superannuation system, which is badly motivated, ideologically driven and unwarranted," he said.

"The Government has proposed changes which will radically change the face of the Australian superannuation system. There are a few key components of the Government's amendments. Others have dealt with them in detail; I will mention them briefly: one-third of super boards must fit their definition of an ‘independent director'; the chair must be independent; the equal representation requirement has been entirely removed; and they have introduced an ‘if not, why not' disclosure of majority independent directors.

"We will be opposing all of these amendments to the act for these five reasons: one, there is no evidence in favour of independent directors; two, the current representative model is working well, as I said; three, there are governance safeguards in place already; four, the proposed changes are overly prescriptive; and, five, the amendments will cost millions of dollars for fund members.

"When it comes to no evidence for independence, the Government has not been able to stack up the claim that maintaining independent directors on not-for-profit superannuation funds would improve fund performance."

However, Liberal MP for Deakin, Micheal Sukkar, described the opposition's resistance to the legislation as "quite embarrassing".

"What should be an uncontroversial change to our superannuation arrangement is being vehemently opposed by those opposite, because it does not accord with the wishes of their union paymasters," he said.

"All we want to do is improve the governance arrangements for super fund boards to ensure that they meet the highest standards of governance."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Ralph

How did the licensee not check this - they should be held to task over it. Obviously they are not making sure their sta...

1 day 4 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Faking exams and falsifying results..... Too stupid to comment on JG...

1 day 5 hours ago
PETER JOHNSTON- AIOFP

Must agree to disagree with you on this one Keith, with the Banks/Institutions largely out of advice now is the time to ...

1 day 5 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 3 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND