Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Independent directors ‘unwarranted’: Chalmers

superannuation/independent-directors/Chalmers/

20 October 2015
| By Nicholas |
image
image image
expand image

Speaking against the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Governance) Bill 2015, which will demand super fund boards be made up of one third independent directors, new shadow minister for financial services and superannuation, Dr Jim  Chalmers, rejected the Government's claim that independent directors would improve performance.

"The bill represents nothing more than a change to our superannuation system, which is badly motivated, ideologically driven and unwarranted," he said.

"The Government has proposed changes which will radically change the face of the Australian superannuation system. There are a few key components of the Government's amendments. Others have dealt with them in detail; I will mention them briefly: one-third of super boards must fit their definition of an ‘independent director'; the chair must be independent; the equal representation requirement has been entirely removed; and they have introduced an ‘if not, why not' disclosure of majority independent directors.

"We will be opposing all of these amendments to the act for these five reasons: one, there is no evidence in favour of independent directors; two, the current representative model is working well, as I said; three, there are governance safeguards in place already; four, the proposed changes are overly prescriptive; and, five, the amendments will cost millions of dollars for fund members.

"When it comes to no evidence for independence, the Government has not been able to stack up the claim that maintaining independent directors on not-for-profit superannuation funds would improve fund performance."

However, Liberal MP for Deakin, Micheal Sukkar, described the opposition's resistance to the legislation as "quite embarrassing".

"What should be an uncontroversial change to our superannuation arrangement is being vehemently opposed by those opposite, because it does not accord with the wishes of their union paymasters," he said.

"All we want to do is improve the governance arrangements for super fund boards to ensure that they meet the highest standards of governance."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

1 day 19 hours ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND