Independent director quotas a backward step: AIST

16 October 2015
| By Nicholas |
image
image
expand image

Imposing quotas on the board of not-for-profit superannuation funds is a backward step and could disrupt the performance of the funds, the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) believes.

AIST chief executive, Tom Garcia, hit out at the proposed reforms, which were made in the Financial System Inquiry final report earlier this year, and in Jeremy Cooper's 2010 review.

"These changes are not about genuine reform," he said. "This is ideologically-driven policy that is not based around evidence and has nothing to do with improving returns for members.

"The OECD has concluded that member representatives should be encouraged to ensure a better alignment of interests between the fund and the members.

"Removing the legislative requirement for member representation takes Australia in the opposite direction to the rest of the world."

In its submission to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee on reforms to super governance, the AIST highlighted results from the Mercer Melbourne Global Pension Index, which found the majority of top performing pension funds internationally, had an equal representation model, or member representation on the board.

Industry Super Australia (ISA) has also hit out at the lack of evidence to support the introduction of one-third independent directors to the boards of not-for-profit funds.

ISA chief executive, David Whiteley, said the Trustee Governance Bill "dismantles the governance structure of the successful not-for-profit super sector, while leaving the scandals and underperformance of the bank-owned sector unaddressed".

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

4 days 15 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

4 days 16 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

5 days 15 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

8 months 4 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND