Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Federal Court finds ActiveSuper misled investors

16 April 2015
| By Nicholas |
image
image image
expand image

The Federal Court of Australia has found ActiveSuper misled clients into investing $3.1 million in a non-existent US-based business and other offshore investments, through self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) it had encouraged them to establish.

Court papers revealed that the alleged contraventions, which included providing financial services without an Australian Financial Services licence, stemmed "from the circumstances in which numerous Australian investors with relatively modest amounts of superannuation were induced to establish SMSFs and to use their superannuation funds for investment in property in the US and in companies incorporated in the British Virgin Islands".

"Most of the invested monies were not used for the purposes contemplated by the investors and have been substantially, if not wholly, lost," the papers revealed.

The Court documents noted that before October 2013, ActiveSuper and its director, Jason Grant Burrows, reached an agreement with ASIC under which Burrows had consented to an order disqualifying him from managing a corporation for a period of 10 years.

ASIC alleged that ActiveSuper engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct in contravention of s 1041H of the Corporations Act and s 12DA of the ASIC Act. The conduct relied upon for this allegation is the dissemination of the US Realty Memorandum containing false representations that:

  1. returns of between 20 and 25 per cent per annum would be paid to investors;
  2. the superannuation monies from the SMSFs would be applied to purchase shares in a private limited liability company to be formed and registered in Arizona, would be applied for the purposes of purchasing foreclosed residential property as part of an investment portfolio; and would be "quarantined in an Australian based trust account" until such time as the Arizonan company was capitalised;
  3. SPG was currently contracted to handle property purchases for US Deals Ltd in New Zealand;
  4. the Manager of the US company was Australian Property Investment Management Arizona Ltd (APIMA), a duly formed company in the State of Arizona.

The Federal Court will hear allegations against a number of co-defendants in the case, who ASIC have alleged were accessories to ActiveSuper's breaches of the Corportations Act, next month.

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND