Court quicker than SCT, says lawyer

superannuation-complaints-tribunal/superannuation-fund/

9 January 2014
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Taking insurance or superannuation disputes to court often results in a quicker resolution than going to the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT), according to a Maurice Blackburn lawyer.

Michael Bates — who specialises in superannuation — responded to comments made by participants of a recent roundtable about the increasing early involvement of lawyers during disputes. Participants had claimed such early involvement undermined the ability of the SCT to resolve the matter.

According to the Australian Administration Services chief information officer Tim Buskens, lawyers would usually get involved in the mid-to-latter stages of the process, but they were now emerging from the outset.

However, Bates said early or earlier engagement of lawyers in superannuation disputes sped up the process, criticising the SCT for the length of time it takes to resolve a case.

"The SCT has, certainly in more recent times, become a tribunal that's very slow to deal with matters," Bates said.

"Even in cases we've taken to the SCT, the delay has been so significant that we now have to advise our clients that taking the matter to court is in fact going to result in a quicker resolution."

From his experience, Bates said the Tribunal would usually take 12-18 months — sometimes even up to two years — to deal with a matter.

"If you put that into context, that is a period of time after the claim has been lodged, considered and presumably rejected, which in itself is another 12 months," Bates said.

"So you have somebody who has an insurance entitlement under superannuation that they've worked hard for all their life, they then suffered an injury or illness, they've stopped working, they've got bills to pay and a family to look after," he said.

After the claim is lodged, it usually takes the superannuation fund or their insurance company six to 12 months to get a decision. If that decision is to reject the claim, they can either ask for the decision to be reviewed or they can go to the SCT.

"That means you're putting another two years on top of that, which is a significant period of time for somebody who has a disability to be waiting to receive what really should be theirs."

Bates added superannuation disputes are often complex and require a legal expert.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

4 days 15 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo