Court quicker than SCT, says lawyer

superannuation-complaints-tribunal/superannuation-fund/

9 January 2014
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Taking insurance or superannuation disputes to court often results in a quicker resolution than going to the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT), according to a Maurice Blackburn lawyer.

Michael Bates — who specialises in superannuation — responded to comments made by participants of a recent roundtable about the increasing early involvement of lawyers during disputes. Participants had claimed such early involvement undermined the ability of the SCT to resolve the matter.

According to the Australian Administration Services chief information officer Tim Buskens, lawyers would usually get involved in the mid-to-latter stages of the process, but they were now emerging from the outset.

However, Bates said early or earlier engagement of lawyers in superannuation disputes sped up the process, criticising the SCT for the length of time it takes to resolve a case.

"The SCT has, certainly in more recent times, become a tribunal that's very slow to deal with matters," Bates said.

"Even in cases we've taken to the SCT, the delay has been so significant that we now have to advise our clients that taking the matter to court is in fact going to result in a quicker resolution."

From his experience, Bates said the Tribunal would usually take 12-18 months — sometimes even up to two years — to deal with a matter.

"If you put that into context, that is a period of time after the claim has been lodged, considered and presumably rejected, which in itself is another 12 months," Bates said.

"So you have somebody who has an insurance entitlement under superannuation that they've worked hard for all their life, they then suffered an injury or illness, they've stopped working, they've got bills to pay and a family to look after," he said.

After the claim is lodged, it usually takes the superannuation fund or their insurance company six to 12 months to get a decision. If that decision is to reject the claim, they can either ask for the decision to be reviewed or they can go to the SCT.

"That means you're putting another two years on top of that, which is a significant period of time for somebody who has a disability to be waiting to receive what really should be theirs."

Bates added superannuation disputes are often complex and require a legal expert.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

4 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

4 months 2 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

6 months 2 weeks ago

Commonwealth Bank has formally dropped to zero advisers following LGT Crestone’s acquisition of its advice arm – some six years on from the Hayne royal commission. ...

1 week 3 days ago

ASIC has banned a former NSW adviser from providing advice for 10 years for investing at least $14.8 million into a cryptocurrency-based scam. ...

3 days 20 hours ago

ASIC has issued a warning to financial advisers to ensure they are complying with client consent requirements when entering into ongoing fee arrangements....

1 week 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3