Continuing divide on default funds

default-funds/APRA/government/industry-super-funds/FSC/amp/treasury/financial-services-council/australian-prudential-regulation-authority/industry-funds/

3 September 2012
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The Government's preferred approach to default funds under modern awards and that supported by many industry super funds would simply serve to add cost and complexity to the arrangements, according to a number of submissions received by the Productivity Commission.

The submissions, reacting to the Productivity Commission's draft report emanating from its inquiry into default funds under modern awards, have revealed a continuing deep divide between the positions adopted by the Government and industry funds and entities such as the Financial Services Council (FSC) and groups such as MLC.

Indeed, a submission filed by MLC with the Productivity Commission argues that imposing a specialist selection panel within Fair Work Australia would not only impose additional cost and complexity, but also place an unnecessary burden on the employer.

It claimed such a move would "continue to hamper competition including diminished capacity for new entrants, potential regulatory arbitrage and the risk of regulatory/procedural disparity due to diverging paths/views between the relevant expert panel and established regulators (in particular, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority)".

For its part, the FSC has consistently argued for the removal of the industrial judiciary in the form of Fair Work Australia, while AMP has warned of the difficulties in establishing an independent body for the selection default fund where "it appears that there is presently no logical body or association in existence that has the requisite skills and resources necessary to house this expert panel".

The AMP submission added, "nor is there a body that has complementary duties or functions that could be relatively easily amended to absorb the responsibility of designing and carrying out a selection process for default funds in awards".

The Minister for Financial Services and Superannuation, Bill Shorten, last month endorsed a submission compiled by the Treasury and the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations as reflecting the Government's preferred position on default funds.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 13 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo