Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

ClearView calls for ‘opt-in’ for group life

ClearView/insurance/superannuation/productivity-commission/

28 August 2017
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Insurer ClearView has told the Productivity Commission (PC) that the superannuation industry should be made to move to an ‘opt-in’ system for group life cover to ensure members know what life insurance cover they actually have.

In a submission filed with the PC’s current inquiry into Superannuation Competitiveness and Efficiency, the insurer claimed a move to ‘opt-in’ for insurance within superannuation would “significantly reduce the number of workers who think they, and their loved ones, are adequately protected when they're not”.

“Importantly it will lead to more workers seeking advice, either via their super fund or a third party, about the type, and level, of cover they need,” the submission said.

ClearView has also played down the Government’s moves to make ‘opting out’ of insurance within superannuation easier, claiming it would fall well short of the mark.

“… making opting out easy still won't help those who don't understand that they are paying for useless cover and who don't even consider that they should opt-out of it,” the submission said.

“In addition, inertia and member disengagement will likely mean it has limited success - indeed the lack of success in getting members to save fees by aggregating duplicate accounts should be instructive in this respect.”

ClearView claimed an ‘opt-in’ model would also force many of the “current inherent cross-subsidies to be addressed and help make transparent what the real costs of the current system”.

“It is ClearView's belief that under the current system, many workers have cover they don't know about while others think they're adequately covered when they're not,” it said.

 “Some members are actually paying premiums for cover they can't even use. They aren't paying for advice and so don't get any, and they or their families have to bear the consequences.”

“If the goal of group life insurance is to protect and maximise value for members, this is a highly inefficient system. It hinders optimal behaviour by discouraging members from properly assessing their insurance needs and regularly reviewing their arrangements. Instead it facilitates a ‘set-and-forget’ approach to insurance, giving members a false sense of security.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND