Can super funds adequately ‘know’ their members?

Millimina super funds members

22 May 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Superannuation trustees are going to have to become far more familiar with their individual members if they are to deliver the full benefits of the proposed Comprehensive Income Products for Retirement (CIPRs) regime, according to research house, Milliman.

In an analysis which points to the need for good advice around the use of CIPRs, the research paper points out that just 20 to 40 per cent of Australians are seeking out the services of a financial planner, something which is often leading to poor decision-making.

It said that, on this basis, superannuation fund trustees will need to get to know their members in the knowledge that placing them in a default accumulation option including default insurance without the member’s knowledge will not be good enough with CIPRs.

“While a ‘safe harbour’ is proposed to protect trustees from claims that a CIPR was not in the best interest of an individual member, the reputational damage could be more extreme,” the Milliman paper said. “For example, what if a small number of members were placed into risk-pooled CIPRs without their knowledge and quickly died, forfeiting their entire super balance? What if a member with a terminal illness was placed into a risk-pooled CIPR?”

The Milliman analysis noted that the Federal Treasury’s CIPR discussion paper had raised such prospects and suggested safe harbour provisions shouldn’t apply in all circumstances, such as terminal illness (or even a low super balance).

“Funds may have a wealth of member information (such as average retirement age, gender, average account balance, occupation, life expectancy of individuals in each occupation and average income during working life), but they need far more,” it said. “There’s only one way a fund can learn it: by asking members. This should include information such as (non-super) average household income and assets, health status and risk preferences.”

The Milliman analysis said that super represented just one slice of household assets.

“Australian households’ financial assets are broadly evenly split across super, property (excluding owner-occupied homes) and other financial assets (including shares), according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics,” it said. “Funds that find out this type of information have an opportunity to become a central retirement hub for members.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Random

What happened to the 700,000 million of MLC if $1.2 Billion was migrated to Expand but Expand had only 512 Million in in...

2 days 8 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

The judge was quite undrstanding! THEN AASSIICC comes along and closes him down!All you 15600 people who work in the bu...

3 days 5 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

How could that underestimate happen?usually the quote transfer straight into the SOA, and what on earth has the commissi...

3 days 6 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 4 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 2 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 4 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND