Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Call for lifetime super caps

chief-executive/ATO/taxation/ASFA/FSC/government-and-regulation/superannuation-funds/financial-services-council/

20 August 2013
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Whichever party wins the forthcoming Federal Election should move to lifetime superannuation contribution caps, enabling people to seriously top up their super in the latter years of their working lives. 

That is the bottom line of a roundtable conducted by Money Management’s sister publication Super Review and sponsored by Metlife at which all the participants supported the concept of lifetime caps as a step beyond a Coalition Government simply lifting concessional contribution caps back towards their pre-2007 levels. 

The concept gained the support of both the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia chief executive, Pauline Vamos, and the chief executive of the Financial Services Council, John Brogden, with Vamos claiming such a move was capable of being implemented within the current capabilities of the Australian Taxation Office. 

“A lifetime cap is the first step and then some annual limits, particularly at the older wages, so that you do get that leveling out of the tax concessions,” she said. “You can do all of that now with the reporting and the centralisation of records under the ATO.” 

Energy Industry Super Scheme chief executive Alex Hutchison said that the current $25,000 a year concessional superannuation cap was simply not enough to allow older workers to play catch-up. 

“Because in a fund like ours the truth is people can’t really start making extra contributions till they’re in their mid 40s, when their mortgage is under control and the kids are leaving school, all those things that everybody’s heard of ad infinitum and you’ve got to catch up and you can’t catch up at $25,000 a year,” he said. 

Deloitte partner Russell Mason said that while there had been much discussion around a future Government legislating to encourage the taking of income streams, people first needed to be allowed to accumulate enough superannuation to be able to generate those streams. 

“I think the majority of Australians would love to have an income stream dilemma and the problem of what to do,” Mason said. “You’ve firstly got to have accumulated enough money to have the dilemma and the vast majority of Australians still haven’t managed to do that.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 4 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND