Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Brogden labels default super a ‘racket’

government/FSC/industry-funds/default-funds/superannuation-funds/financial-services-council/chief-executive/

16 October 2014
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The current default superannuation fund regime overseen by the Fair Work Commission represents nothing more nor less than a distribution channel for industry funds, according to Financial Services Council chief executive, John Brogden.

Brogden has told a debate forum at the National Press Club in Canberra that the Fair Work Commission must be removed from the default fund process in circumstances where what had been established by the previous Labor Government was not so much a safety net as "a racket"

Further, Brogden argued that by opening up the default funds regime to genuine competition, the Government could effectively drive down fees.

"I want to strip away the debate and show the Fair Work Commission default superannuation process for what it really is — a distribution channel for the industry funds," he said. "Why else would Industry Funds today launch a desperate, farcical and extraordinarily hypocritical proposal to restrict one class of superannuation funds from the opportunity to provide Australians with low cost, high performing retirement funds?"

"The Government has a genuine opportunity to further reduce fees in superannuation and boost member returns by opening up the default superannuation market to competition. In its final days the previous Government legislated a conflicted and anti-competitive process for selecting default superannuation terms in modern awards."

Brogden said that while the former Labor Government had legislated that the Fair Work Commission must review every super fund in all 122 modern awards and select new funds, the FWC process allowed only unions and employer organisations to make submission into which fund is selected for each award.

"The previous Government chose three experts to sit on the review panel, two of whom have had to stand aside due to potential conflicts of interest. One of the ‘experts' appointed was on the Board of an industry super fund. The current default superannuation process is conflicted, anti-competitive, and must be abolished. It is not a safety net — it's a racket!" Brogden said.

"The FWC process delivers industry funds monopoly control over $9 billion in annual flows of default super contributions," he claimed.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

1 day 20 hours ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND