Banks to treat loans to SMSFs as non-standard

australian-prudential-regulation-authority/SMSFs/self-managed-superannuation-funds/APRA/executive-general-manager/

22 January 2013
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has signalled it regards lending to self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) by banks as potentially riskier than other forms of lending.

The regulator pushed its way into the debate around lending within SMSFs last week, via its role as a banking regulator and by stipulating how lending institutions should treat loans to SMSFs.

In a letter to all Australian incorporated Authorised Deposit-taking Institutions (ADIs), APRA's  executive general manager, policy, research and statistics Charles Littrell said the regulator was seeking to clarify the appropriate capital treatment of ADIs' loans to SMSFs that are secured by residential mortgages.

In doing so, it said it wanted to clarify that SMSF loans were to be treated as 'non-standard' eligible mortgages, and then explained its thinking by saying that the structures involved in SMSF loans were relatively more complex than those for standard eligible mortgages and involved no recourse rights to an SMSF's other assets.

As well, the APRA letter warned that the structure of the loans also required more complex arrangements such as personal guarantees, "with insufficient empirical evidence as yet on the relative strength of the pledging arrangement or the ultimate enforceability of the personal guarantees in comparison to more traditional arrangements".

It said that, as such, "SMSF loans may have a different and potentially higher loss profile in comparison to standard loans".

The APRA letter also said the regulator wanted to emphasise that where a lending institution was extending credit to SMSFs, it was the institution's responsibility to ensure it had given detailed consideration "to the particular risks of lending to a superannuation fund, and that its application process verifies all relevant compliance matters that might impact on the ability of an SMSF to service the loan".

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 3 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 4 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

3 weeks 6 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

2 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

1 week 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo