Banks to treat loans to SMSFs as non-standard

22 January 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has signalled it regards lending to self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) by banks as potentially riskier than other forms of lending.

The regulator pushed its way into the debate around lending within SMSFs last week, via its role as a banking regulator and by stipulating how lending institutions should treat loans to SMSFs.

In a letter to all Australian incorporated Authorised Deposit-taking Institutions (ADIs), APRA's  executive general manager, policy, research and statistics Charles Littrell said the regulator was seeking to clarify the appropriate capital treatment of ADIs' loans to SMSFs that are secured by residential mortgages.

In doing so, it said it wanted to clarify that SMSF loans were to be treated as 'non-standard' eligible mortgages, and then explained its thinking by saying that the structures involved in SMSF loans were relatively more complex than those for standard eligible mortgages and involved no recourse rights to an SMSF's other assets.

As well, the APRA letter warned that the structure of the loans also required more complex arrangements such as personal guarantees, "with insufficient empirical evidence as yet on the relative strength of the pledging arrangement or the ultimate enforceability of the personal guarantees in comparison to more traditional arrangements".

It said that, as such, "SMSF loans may have a different and potentially higher loss profile in comparison to standard loans".

The APRA letter also said the regulator wanted to emphasise that where a lending institution was extending credit to SMSFs, it was the institution's responsibility to ensure it had given detailed consideration "to the particular risks of lending to a superannuation fund, and that its application process verifies all relevant compliance matters that might impact on the ability of an SMSF to service the loan".

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Ralph

How did the licensee not check this - they should be held to task over it. Obviously they are not making sure their sta...

1 day 19 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Faking exams and falsifying results..... Too stupid to comment on JG...

1 day 20 hours ago
PETER JOHNSTON- AIOFP

Must agree to disagree with you on this one Keith, with the Banks/Institutions largely out of advice now is the time to ...

1 day 20 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 3 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND