ASFA wants longer implementation on MySuper

ASFA/superannuation-funds/stronger-super/FOFA/association-of-superannuation-funds/government/mysuper/parliamentary-joint-committee/financial-advice/

1 February 2012
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) is calling on the Government to provide a longer implementation period for the introduction of MySuper arrangements.

In a submission filed with the Parliamentary Joint Committee reviewing the Government's Stronger Super bills, ASFA has argued that the employer compliance date for MySuper arrangements should be extended beyond the Government's planned 1 October, 2013, deadline to 1 July, 2014.

The ASFA call for a longer implementation period for MySuper follows on from arguments around the Government's 1 July, 2012, implementation date for the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) bills.

The ASFA submission said that while the organisation supported the Stronger Super reforms, "it is important to note that compliance with these reforms will necessitate considerable changes being made to a mature and complex superannuation system".

It said that, in addition, the FOFA reforms which are due to commence during the same period would have a significant impact on the structures of some superannuation funds.

"Some trustees will need a great deal of certainty in relation to the legislation to be able to make the threshold decision as to whether or not to provide a MySuper offering," the submission said. "This is the case in particular where a relatively small percentage of contributions are default contributions."

It said that following the threshold decision, there were a variety of strategic and tactical decisions which needed to be made.

"As we are unlikely to see final legislation in the first half of 2012, the time afforded to implement is greatly reduced," the ASFA submission said.

It said that often there were capacity constraints, interdependencies and unintended consequences, especially when it came to implementing system changes.

"Rushing to meet deadlines materially increases the risks to a project and can increase costs which are ultimately born by the member," the submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 2 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo