APRA admits some MySuper funds are falling short

compliance/"funds-management"/

4 November 2016
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) appears to have backed the claims of industry superannuation funds that not all MySuper products are good enough to be used as default funds.

In a submission which has substantially undermined calls for all eligible MySuper funds to be available to employers as default funds, APRA has told the Productivity Commission (PC) inquiry into alternative default arrangement that the performance of MySuper funds had so far been highly variable.

What is more, the regulator has suggested that the Government may need to legislate both stronger authorisation requirements and a broader member outcomes assessment "with a view to lifting the bar that MySuper products on an ongoing basis.

The APRA submission said that since the introduction of MySuper in July, 2013, there had been considerable variation in net returns and fees for different MySuper products, leading to a wide range of outcomes for members across the different products.

"While there has been some evidence of reductions in fees and costs since MySuper products were introduced, particularly for products with previously very high fee levels, there is clearly room for further improvement," it said.

"Further, while many MySuper products have achieved their net return targets over the past few years, some have fallen well short."

APRA's submission said the current test being applied to MySuper funds (the scale test) was narrowly focused and did not ensure that all of the factors that may affect member outcomes, including insurance, advice and administration services, were considered by superannuation funds when assessing the relative quality of their MySuper product.

"APRA has emphasised to RSE licensees the importance of having a broader ‘member outcomes' focus when undertaking their annual scale test assessment (and also in assessing the ongoing sustainability of their business operations)," it said.

"This requires looking beyond net investment returns to broader qualitative and quantitative outcomes for all members."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 2 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 3 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

3 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

1 week 3 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

1 week 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo